ISSN (Print) - 0012-9976 | ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846

Articles by Gita ChadhaSubscribe to Gita Chadha

Evelyn Fox Keller: A Tribute

Evelyn Fox Keller, who passed away on 22 September 2023, was a leading figure in the field of Feminist Science Studies, a field that has gradually developed over the last three decades in India. Fox Keller visited the National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bengaluru, in 2004 on an invitation by biologist Obaid Siddiqi. Fox Keller gave lectures at select scientific institutions that were attended by many who are now leading figures in the field of feminist science studies in India. This memoir tribute, both personal and professional, highlights some of Fox Keller's arguments on the need to reimagine the method of science and on the ethico-moral responsibility that must lie with the scientific establishment.

Pandemic Conversations: Gender, Marginalities, and COVID-19

We do not know if we live in a world any more risky than those of earlier generations. It is not the quantity of risk, but the quality of control or—to be more precise—the known uncontrollability of the consequences of civilisational decisions, that makes the historical difference. Therefore, I use the term “manufactured uncertainties.” The institutionalised expectation of control, even the leading ideas of “certainty” and “rationality” are collapsing. …the main difference between the premodern culture of fear and the second modern culture of fear is: in premodernity the dangers and fears could be attributed to gods or God or nature and the promise of modernity was to overcome those threats by more modernisation and more progress—more science, more market economy, better and new technologies, safety standards, etc. In the age of risk, the threats we are confronted with cannot be attributed to God or nature but to “modernisation” and “progress” itself. Thus, the culture of fear derives from the paradoxical fact that the institutions that are designed to control produced uncontrollability. Ulrich Beck, On Fear and Risk Society, Interview with Joshua J Yates, the Hedgehog Review

Towards Complex Feminist Solidarities after the List-Statement

The list-statement controversy has generated heated debates amongst feminists in India. Described as a feminist civil war, the controversy has presented a moment of several reckonings. This article argues that in order to repair the damage done to the movement, feminists must build conversations around the axis of generation, intersectionality and netizen identities. It also suggests some contours for these conversations.

Evoking Waris Shah

Why we must reclaim the idea of an undivided Punjab, but not nostalgia for it.

Feminist Science Studies

Feminist science studies (FSS) is a field of study that is interdisciplinary. It draws upon the philosophy, historiography and sociology of science.1 It also has to necessarily draw upon the practice of science itself.

Plagiarism in Physics: Time for Introspection

Using the recent 'scandal' about an instance of plagiarism in physics involving the vice-chancellor of Kumaon University and his student, to a discussion on the larger sociological issues in the culture of science arguing that the issue of plagiarism concerns not just the scientific community but the entire academic community.

Sokal's Hoax: A Backlash to Science Criticism

Because of the connection between knowledge and politics, someone urging a view about scientific inquiry may be understood and read as supporting a political analysis, even when that is not her intent. We all care deeply about polities, hence there is more than enough room for misunderstanding and hurt.

Exploring Uneasy Terrain

Gita Chadha Scientific Communities in the Developing World edited by Jacques Gaillard, V V Krishna and Roland Waast; Sage Publications, December 1996; pp 398,

Sokal's Hoax and Tensions in Scientific Left

Though apparently an attack on a specific genre of writing in the social sciences, i e, the post-modernist one, the focus of Alan Sokal's hoax extends over the entire methodological debate in science, natural and social It also extends over the entire range of science critiques that seek to reinterpret the canons of mainstream modern science. However, these critiques of science, it is argued here, cannot simply be pushed into the political left or right nor can they be interpreted as proor anti-science which is what Sokal's position finally amounts to.

Science Question in Post-Colonial Feminism

Science Question in Post-Colonial Feminism Gita Chadha MUCH as I am tempted to agree with Mira Nanda's proposition that reason needs to be affirmed "as an ally of all those struggling to break free from the margins which their natal cultures have consigned them to" and that "scientific rationality can serve to generate a critical stance toward the cultural discourses that constitute the self-identities of women living under traditional patriarchal arrangements in post-colonial societies" [Nanda 1996], it would be fruitful to critically examine and reconstitute some of the ideas contained within these statements, especially since Nanda mounts this defence of reason (used synonymously with scientific rationality, which synonymous use I think is a pedagogical error since reason is a more general term and scientific rationality a specific form of it) not only as the tool for a critical appraisal of traditional systems but also as a defence of Descartes and modern science, both of which have come under attack by critical theorists and by post-modem theorists. At the outset, it is essential to realise that the feminist critiques of rationality and modern science are not limited by the post-modernist attack on enlightenment reason as a category of transcendental and universal truth. This is not to deny the fact that the post-modernist turn in the philosophy of science, and in epistemology, have contributed significantly to the debate over developing the feminist relationship with science its craft, its metaphysics and its ideology. The debate, like the relationship, is a rough and passionate one.

Back to Top